June 25, 2008

Glenn Beck Fill-in Host Can't Hear

I think it was Monday, that I was listening to The Glenn Beck Program on Rochester's 50,000 watt news radio station, WHAM 1180 AM. And trying to work at the same time, which involves getting in and out of the truck, having the truck's mechanicals interfere with radio reception, and even driving into buildings that serve as effective Faraday cages. At any rate, I don't get to hear everything, by any stretch.

So, I got in the truck, and fill-in host Pat Gray was talking with a truck driver who had phoned in. Turns out that he hauls breakfast cereal, and had a theory (near as I could tell) that consolidation in the food industry had driven up prices since roughly the year 2000. Corn Flakes have become a standard example product, on account of high corn prices. It must be consolidation, though, since rising fuel and corn prices could not fully explain it, he said. Gray wasn't having any of that, since diesel is currently a few times as expensive as it was-- and so is corn. The driver explained that he was getting a fuel surcharge of 70 cents per mile (adding such a surcharge is customary, when fuel prices rise, rather than constantly changing the base rate), and that they can fit as many as 10,000 boxes of cereal in his trailer. Gray continually mis-heard this as fuel being up 70 cents per gallon in the last few years, which doesn't make any sense, and eventually dismissed the whole notion as tragically flawed math.

I, however, can hear-- at least when circumstances allow me to receive clear sound from my radio.

Unless this chap drives like heck, he's going to get at least 5 miles per gallon with his truck. Which means that his freight rate is being adjusted by the equivalent of at least $3.50/gallon, which is about how much fuel is up in the last few years. He no doubt has a 53 foot long 'dry van' trailer, which has a capacity of about 140 cubic yards, and can very plausibly hold 10,000 boxes of cereal. Which means that, even if the load is shipped 1000 miles, Kellog's is only paying, per box, an extra 7 cents.

If it's, say, a 24 ounce box of Corn Flakes, then we can roughly consider that to be a pound and a half of corn. A bushel of corn weighs 56 pounds, give or take. Even at the current "Holy cow, there's huge floods in the mid-west" price of about $8/bushel, the total cost of the corn in that cereal box is about 21 cents. Up from 8 cents, at a $3/bushel rule of thumb.

For a whopping 20 cents increase in the cost of your Corn Flakes, based on the two factors which are generally believed to be the problem. I don't know about the food industry consolidation theory, but I can do math-- and so could that other trucker.


Edited five minutes later, for uncharacteristic multiple errors.

Posted by Mitch at 11:55 PM | Comments (1)

May 02, 2006

One Short Trip for a Truck

As all of the regulars know, I drive a truck. I drive the same truck such an overwhelming proportion of the time (and it driven only by me to a similarly overwhelming degree), that it is clearly defined as "mine." I don't own it, personally-- and yet, I almost do, since it's the family business. As it happens, my truck is named "Snowball."

Click me
Snowball

Snowball is a 1990 International model 9370 tandem tractor, also known as a pretty average highway truck of moderate age. It's not very nimble, and the presence of the sleeper compartment means that I don't have a rear window. Considering the feats of maneuverability-- especially backing-- that I have to perform at various junkyards, I describe Snowball in a negative light as an "old road cow." In spite of these practical considerations, I love my truck.

A while back, I drove bobtail (without a trailer) down to the Flying J truck stop for fuel, since it always has the best price around, and the actual freight runs hadn't sent me past the place lately. That sort of trip has to be considered carefully, since I'm sure I burned $5 worth of fuel, just to go buy cheaper fuel.

Everything went just fine. On my way out, though, I noticed a Canadian truck with a problem. Clearly a problem, since it was stopped between the entrance and the fuel islands, and the hood was open. Engine trouble, I reckoned. Nothing I could possibly help with.

But then I heard a whistle, so I stopped. At low speeds, it's almost always wise to stop when there's a problem-- even if you have no idea what the problem might be. I have a similar reaction to crane operators beeping their horns, since it either means 'that's a good spot to unload,' or 'hey, stupid-- you're going to hit something.'

In this case, it was the somewhat rain-bedraggled driver of the afflicted truck trying to summon my attention. As he jogged over, I pondered what the issue might be, that I could conceivably help with. Perhaps an air compressor failure, as I could easily provide an infusion of air, which would enable the truck's brakes to be released at least a couple of times, allowing it to move again. Yes-- that was a likely scenario.

Likely, but incorrect. The driver was, in fact, Canadian-- and a Quebecer, to boot, but he spoke English well enough for the purpose at hand. "Can you help me?" he asked. "I have no fuel." [dramatic pause] "Do you think you could pull me up to the pumps?"

Clearly, he'd picked me because I didn't have a trailer.

"Probably," I replied. "I have a fifteen-speed."

"You want to try?"

"Yes."

I turned around, and he already had two shiny new chains out. Flatbed hauler, you see, and that often involves chains for cargo securement. Why, yes-- it was loaded. The load was tarped, but I'd bet it was metal, which is a notoriously heavy cargo type.

He had a tow hook on his truck, and we just put the chain around my last frame member (which had been bent by the 35-ton oops incident anyway).

My only worry was a possible lack of traction, as the pavement was wet, and I had no appreciable weight on the drive axles. Oh, yeah-- and it's noticably uphill from the road to the pumps. Once we were chained up, he hit the brake release button(s), and his truck rolled backward immediately. Snowball bounced on its rear suspension airbags when the chain went tight, but the tires didn't budge. That was a good sign.

I hopped in, put it in extra-low (the fifteen-speed transmission has a special "deep reduction" range that is almost two gears lower than "low"), and we moved just fine.

He was heavy, though. I know heavy.

At any rate, the operation was perfectly successful. I had the right tool, in the right place, at the right time, and I really helped that guy out. If there's a merit badge for towing, then someone should award it to either me, or Snowball. A difficult judgement call, there.

Posted by Mitch at 02:04 AM | Comments (0)

July 31, 2004

Great Driver Mitch

About a month ago, I passed the road skills test for my Commercial Drivers License (CDL) class A, with tank truck endorsement and no restrictions. At last, I became Great Driver Mitch.

No doubt many of you have been wondering how I came up with that expression for my current profession. Well, once upon a time, in a land far, far away... (OK, it was Japan, but that's a land far from where I am) I think there was a manga (comic) called "Onizuka." I'm having trouble verifying this, but I hear that main character Onizuka Eikichi (family name first) was a member of a biker gang, and had all sorts of wild and crazy adventures.

Whether there was such an ancestral series, or not, there was definitely a manga, and also anime entitled "Great Teacher Onizuka." It seems that Onizuka decided that-- in order to meet girls-- he would become an O-sensei, or 'great teacher.' Dubbing himself Great Teacher Onizuka, or "GTO" (yes, he says the letters of the English abbreviation, despite speaking in Japanese), he goes on to have all sorts of wild and crazy adventures, helping out people along the way (though they usually resist at first). Highly recommended.

At one point early on in the anime, Onizuka believes that he will never get a job as a teacher, and so he becomes a long-haul truck driver. As you may have guessed, he then dubs himself "GDO" (Great Driver Onizuka). Equally naturally, this only lasts until there is a glimmer of hope that he can be a teacher again.

You know-- I've been calling myself Great Driver Mitch for a while now, and I just realized a parallel with Onizuka Eikichi for the first time. I, too, want to be a teacher. True, I don't intend to use that position to meet women, and I want to be a college professor instead of a high school teacher, but still-- the need to share knowledge... it fills me. It is neat. (Bonus points for identifying the source of that quote.)

Posted by Mitch at 02:50 PM | Comments (1)

May 31, 2004

The 35-Ton "Oops"

Last time, I told you about my first day as Great Driver Mitch. It was a Friday, and we don't haul much on weekends this time of year. I drove just a couple of days in the second week. The third week, though, featured a long day every day-- with the partial exception of Tuesday. Work on Tuesday was artificially shortened.

The story isn't particularly technical, but I learned some time ago that many people know nothing at all about trucks. So, as usual, a little background is in order. You learn something new every day, after all-- unless you only read my site, in which case it's definitely not every day.

A tractor-trailer is held together by a large pin on the trailer (the "kingpin"), which is secured by locking jaws in a hinged plate on the tractor. That plate is called the "fifth wheel," presumably because it's vaguely round, and trucks only had four wheels back when it was invented. A fifth wheel looks like this.

A tractor-trailer is also known as a "semi," because the trailer is technically a semi-trailer; the weight is supported roughly half by the trailer axles, and half by the tractor. A full trailer would place relatively little weight (or none) on the vehicle pulling it-- like a trailer pulled by a car, or a child's little red wagon.

Now, since the front of a semi-trailer is so heavy, and it has to be about four feet off the ground in order to get the tractor under it, there has to be a rugged mechanism for holding it up. This consists of a pair of extendable legs, known (even officially) as "landing gear." A landing gear leg looks like this (external link). Both legs are conveniently adjusted by the single crank.

Most of time, a trailer is loaded and unloaded while still coupled to the tractor. Sometimes, though, this is a poor use of time or equipment, and a technique called "drop and hook" is employed. One form of drop and hook is 'spotting' empty trailers at several locations, where they can be loaded at the convenience of others, and then you come and haul the load once the trailer is full. This was the theory behind the third load of the day on Tuesday...

OK, so I wheeled into town 'bobtail' (without a trailer), to pick up an already loaded trailer, and then proceed merrily to Rochester. Since I don't have my license yet, I don't want to give the impression that I'm some sort of ham-handed idiot. As such, I dropped the air from the tractor rear suspension, and gently backed under just until the kingpin hit. Wouldn't want to bang into it like an unskilled fool. I then reversed direction and gave it a little tug. Wouldn't want to twist the driveshaft. Declaring (out loud, no less) the connection secure, I made the rest of the connections, and we were on our way.

My usual co-pilot is teaching me old-school techniques, and one of these is to use the trailer-only brake valve to test the trailer brakes-- and, in theory, the security of the coupling. So I did that, and the brakes worked. There was then a fairly loud and jarring bang. We figured that it must have been a particularly intense version of a common effect that follows using the trailer brakes-- because it couldn't possibly have been... no, that thought doesn't bear thinking on, because it couldn't be that!

The co-pilot then explains the importance of making sure you're hooked up properly, saying "Once you drop a trailer [accidentally], you never want it to happen again." I'm thinking that he's right-- that would be a very bad experience. A few seconds later, we slowly came to a small-- but steep-- rise, and there was a sound that I'd just as soon not hear again:

BOOM!

When the trailer fell, it sheared the pin on the landing gear foot that hit the pavement first. That single foot was designed to hold up 50 tons. Sheared it. We extracted the pin later, and it was shaped like a steel burrito.

As Shannon Foraker might say, "Oops."

So much for my looking like an idiot. Idiocy aside, though, we had to solve the problem of hooking back up. The very front of the trailer was nowhere near four feet from the ground, and the landing gear wasn't designed to lift a loaded trailer any great distance-- even with the crank in low gear.

The solution came in the form of a gigantic articulated wheel loader. Indeed, Caterpillar only makes three larger loaders. It picked up the front of the trailer-- perhaps fifteen tons-- and then the landing gear could be cranked down with ease. The trailer was backed back to the spot from whence it came, and the load was delayed due to the extremely uncool occurance. As it happens, I hauled it the next morning. Heavy bugger.

So, what had gone wrong? We'll never know, since if the problem had been detected before the disconnect, then nothing would have fallen off of anything. The working theory is that when I dropped the air on the tractor, the fifth wheel became too low, and the pin rode above the jaws that should have grasped it. There are a couple of other possibilities, but the bottom line is that it wasn't coupled properly in the first place. Car drivers will be happy to know that it is impossible for a Fontaine (our favored brand) fifth wheel to just come unhooked.

Needless to say, I am now paranoid about the possibility of a false coupling. It's just as my mentor said-- you never want it to happen again. Indeed, one of my college professors had a highly applicable saying: "You learn by doing-- and usually what you learn is 'don't do that.'"

Posted by Mitch at 12:45 AM | Comments (0)

May 20, 2004

I Travelled Kilometers

According to the Merriam-Webster Online Dictionary, the past tense of travel can be spelled as "traveled" or "travelled." For whatever reason, I dislike the aesthetics of both spellings. Ah, well...

I hadn't driven a truck lately, but I was a passenger two weeks ago, when we went to Hamilton, Ontario, Canada to pick up liquid fertilizer. Now, at least half of the time, when I say "liquid fertilizer," people think that it's a euphemism for manure. Logical, but not in this case. We haul a few types of liquid fertilizer, but lately it's been the all-nitrogen variety. My working hypothesis is that it's urea and ammonium nitrate dissolved in water-- a large amount of it, considering the stuff weighs 11 pounds per gallon.

Here in the United States, local distributors supply "30% nitrogen." I'll eventually run the math to see how they compute that. At the place we went to in Canada, the Canadian trucks picked up 28%, and the American trucks received 32%. As to why that is... regulation? tradition? Who knows.

Hamilton is at the western tip of Lake Ontario, and we picked up the fertilizer right on the waterfront. A large amount of industry occurs in that region, and it was neat to see it-- if mostly in the distance, on the other side of a broad channel. Only one ship within sight was unloading at the time. At that distance, I can only guess that the product was coal.

Anyway, the Canada trip went well. There's an awful lot to see while cruising along the QEW (Queen Elizabeth Way, possibly the highest-traffic highway in Canada)-- and it was all new to me, considering I haven't even been in the country since 1992. There's an amazing amount of greenhouse floorspace, for example.

We crossed the border both ways with just a few questions. Of course, we had customs papers for the load. We think they can measure the rough weight of the truck, so they know when you're empty. They run your license plate numbers. At some crossings, (but I don't think all, yet) they X-ray the trailer-- and if they're suspicious after a couple of tries, your truck will be guarded by heavily armed men while the situation is examined, probed, and sometimes disassembled.

They have some funny trucks over there in what the TV commercials
advocating Canadian tourism call "the world next door." I'll have to describe them sometime.

That trip was on a Wednesday, and was the same day that our only employee (a driver, oddly enough) quit. Slightly inconvenient, that. On Thursday, I tagged along with my brother again, and we hauled another load of urea ammonium nitrate (UAN)-- this time out of Rochester (New York). That's where most of it that we haul comes from.

After everything was loaded up and battened down (it's a liquid product, so nautical terms seem barely appropriate), I decided to go start the truck. Seemed like a good idea, so we could leave as soon as possible. My brother then proceeds-- instead of evicting me from the driver's seat-- to get in on the passenger side, and demand that we leave immediately.

Now, I had never before driven a truck loaded to the normal maximum gross weight of 80,000 pounds. The theory is the same as an empty truck: acceleration is low, stopping requires planning, and you have to watch it going around curves at speed. Yes, the theory is the same-- only more so. But, hey-- you learn by doing, right? It went fine, with a little coaching now and then.

By Friday, my brother had more-or-less hired a retired driver (and friend of ours) to be my co-pilot, and had scheduled three loads for me to haul. We have two trucks, and he was going to be busy all day, too. I am a holder of a CDL (commercial driver's license) learner's permit, so, legally, I need a licensed driver along for the ride. Aside from the legal matter, the advice is appreciated.

It ended up being two loads. The first was junk cars, and that went OK. The second was liquid fertilizer, which surprises no one this time of year. It ended up being something of an adventure.

We pick up this UAN stuff quite close to the Rochester airport. It's an old fuel or oil terminal, circa 1951. Now, I had observed the loading procedures at this location many times, but I hadn't attempted to perform any of them.

The fight to place the overhead loading pipe was more comical than anything else. Re-extracting it proved a little tricky, as it got pinched by one of the technologically advanced truck inner tubes that are inside the tank to counter the slosh effect (since the trailer isn't full to the top, a wave forms readily from acceleration or braking). Once it was freed, I head a little clink and splash.

The rubber gasket for the manhole lid had been hit perfectly by the end of the loading pipe to cause it to fall right in. It didn't float. I tried to fish it out, but I couldn't reach the bottom with available tools.

The main road headed west out of Rochester is interstate 490 (so named since I-90 passes directly below the city). If your destination has a southward bent, stay on 490. For almost straight west with a hint of North, get on route 531. As it happens, that's the direction to our home base-- so a huge percentage of our truck trips go down 531.

The delivery was supposed to be at a farm just east of the end of the 531, on route 31 (go figure). We had a street address. So I got off at the last exit, drove through quite slowly... and missed it. Suddenly, we were past the number (it was on the left-hand side), though there had been a mysterious dirt driveway that wasn't any too wide-- the ditches are deep enough to topple a truck with ease.

The solution (pun detected) was to continue a few miles, get back on the 531, and try again.

So I stopped across the road from the driveway, and went to have a look. Sure enough, there were plastic tanks there-- complete with a tractor and a little barn-- but no people. Did I mention that the delivery was two days late, since the driver had unceremoniously quit just before he would have hauled this load?

I had just about decided to either start making phone calls, or just fill the tanks, when a red pickup truck wheeled in. The guy didn't know what to do, but he called his home base to check. He reported the presence of a fertilizer truck, and then relayed the bad news: go to the main farm, which is off of Elmgrove road. That's the first exit from the 531. On the plus side, I was told that I couldn't miss it, and that there'd be a guy waiting.

So I went down 31, through an estimated four stoplights (which is a fair distance, on a curvy hilly semi-rural road), and eventually wound my way to the main farm. Couldn't miss it, indeed.

There was also, as promised, a guy waiting. He ambled over to the truck... and gave me the bad news. That place you just left? You have to go back there.

You see, they'd been expected a shipment of dry fertilizer that day, and had two hoppers waiting to receive it. Apparently, the red pickup guy had spoken with the home farm via phone again in the meantime, and they asked, "Wait, what kind of truck is it?" He told them it was a tanker... so they then knew of the mistake, but they didn't know how to contact me in the truck.

It looked like I might be able to drive around the building right there, so I asked. The guy says no, you'll have to pull around another building, back up, and go out the same way.

I do that, with some coaching. It wasn't too hard, since I had the target to back toward of two pickup trucks. With guys standing around. So if they'd moved the pickups, I could have driven out that way. Or maybe they knew something that I didn't. Mud, perhaps.

Wind back down the street, and come out to make the unassisted left turn onto Elmgrove. At a bit after 4 PM. This looked roughly like it was going to be possible on the twelfth of Never. But a shiny blue refuse truck eventually came to my rescue, stopping traffic to let me go ahead of him-- out of the kindness of his own heart.

Get on the 531, bop down to the end, make the now familiar right turn onto 31, and approach the driveway of failure intolerance. Came in on an initial arc that would lead to the ditch, backed up a bit, and that was that. The trailer wheels were feet from a really serious disaster.

The pump was brand new. Hadn't pumped a drop in its life. That wasn't a problem. What was a problem is that the outlet comes straight out the top, and we didn't have an elbow on hand (so to speak). So a two inch (inside diameter) line filled the 11 lb/gal product emerged from the top of the pump, and trailed down to the ground (about five feet). That didn't look healthy for the plastic pump housing, so I stood there to hold it against the fender.

Unfortunately, the hose junction on the outlet was leaking a decent amount. Attempting to tighten it with a small Crescent (tm) wrench failed.

About that time the red pickup guy from before drove up in his bulldozer. He scammed a second hose clamp from a nearby tank, had just the right size wrench, and we redid the thing with both hose clamps.

All better.

Had to fill three different tanks to get it all off. No big deal. And then...

The location of the aforementioned bulldozer left a relatively small space to back into for turning around. The other side of the laneway was some other guy's lawn (he was mowing it), so we didn't want to drive on that any more than necessary.

My co-pilot provided useful suggestions. It took a while. A sense of accomplishment was achieved.

That trip might be a record for most screwing around, but you know what? I got a lot of practice, and I once heard tell that you learn by doing.

Posted by Mitch at 12:20 AM | Comments (0)

October 10, 2003

Six Days on the Road (well, only two)

I've been using song titles for blog entries for a while now, so why stop just because of an inappropriate number?

I drove the big big truck for over 200 miles of the roughly 1100 mile trip, in two stretches, of which the longer was 165 miles. This is a good step on my way to becoming Great Driver Mitch, since it's about four times as far as I had previously driven a truck.

At something like 60,000 pounds gross weight, it was also about twice as heavy as I had driven-- since practice should be begun with a margin for error. An unladen tractor-trailer weighs in the vicinity of 30 thousand, and the normal maximum gross weight is 80 thousand. Practicing with an empty truck is where you start, because (for one thing) it's obviously a lot easier to stop. True, being empty can cause trailer tires to lock up with vigorous brake application, but "flatspotting" tires beats running into something.

I drove all of those miles on the New York State Thruway (tm), which consists of I-90 (and part of I-87), and is almost entirely a toll road. The "service areas" are state-administered monopolies, which apparently have some sort of bidding process. At least two different brands of fuel can be found at different stops, and a few different food choices can be found throughout the system (any given stop will have at least two places to eat). In fact, all of that information is on the back of the toll ticket. If you want Mobil gas, you can find out where the next rest stop which sells it is located.

Fuel prices aren't too bad on the Thruway. They used to be, but then these signs appeared which said 'Lower fuel prices in effect.' Too bad no such evolution has occurred in the food prices...

Many stops have either a Burger King or McDonalds, but among the ones which do not, Roy Rogers and Big Boy is a common pairing. The Big Boy wouldn't do, being a 'sit-down' restaurant. While waiting is common in trucking, while out on the road, you either want to be moving or sleeping. That left Roy Rogers, of which my only previous experience had also been on the Thruway, and I hadn't been all that impressed. Yesterday's visit, though, sealed my opinion.

My quarter-pound bacon cheeseburger wasn't bad, though it had been under heat lamps for an unknown amount of time. Roy Rogers is a la carte, so nearly everything is under heat lamps before you grab it and put it on your tray. I can't quite forgive them for it being over three dollars, but hey-- captive audience prices, right? The fries were quite blah, clearly having been sitting around for a good long while. The clincher was the chicken sandwich that my brother got. Upwards of four bucks for a pieces-parts-pressed slab of supposed chicken-- of indeterminate age, at that. Roy Rogers is spinning in his grave.

Word to the wise: if you want an expensive chicken sandwich, then go to Arby's. You won't wish that you hadn't eaten there. You know-- I could go for a Chicken Bacon and Swiss right about now...

Posted by Mitch at 11:12 PM | Comments (0)

October 08, 2003

Truck Drivin' Son of a Gun

Ah... the trucking industry. It's the family business these days, you see. Normally, we're rather local.

"Your brother called; you're going to Boston."

Um. OK.

So if I seem a bit out of touch for the next couple of days, there's a reason for that.

Posted by Mitch at 05:58 PM | Comments (0)